On believing and hoping whether

Aaron Steven White

Abstract


Theories of clause selection that aim to explain the distribution of interrogative and declarative complement clauses often take as a starting point that predicates like think, believe, hope, and fear are incompatible with interrogative complements. After discussing experimental evidence against the generalizations on which these theories rest, I give corpus evidence that even the core data are faulty: think, believe, hope, and fear are in fact compatible with interrogative complements, suggesting that any theory predicting that they should not be must be jettisoned.

EARLY ACCESS

Keywords


clause embedding; selection; interrogative; veridical; neg-raising; preferential

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.14.6

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

ISSN: 1937-8912

Journal doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp